Chelsea’s recent struggles on the pitch have led to growing concerns among fans and analysts, with the club’s hierarchy reportedly considering the possibility of sacking manager Graham Potter. However, if FC Chelsea decides to part ways with Potter, it will come at a significant cost.
Cost to Sack Graham Potter
According to reports, FC Chelsea will have to pay an estimated £50 million to terminate Potter’s contract, which is a record payout for a managerial dismissal. This is in addition to the £22 million that the club paid Brighton to release him and his backroom team from their contracts in September 2022, which was also a world record fee.
Potter was appointed as Chelsea’s manager in 2022 with much optimism and excitement, thanks to his attacking philosophy and innovative tactics. However, the team’s recent form has been far from impressive, with only two wins in their last 15 games in all competitions, including a recent 2-0 loss to Tottenham.
FC Chelsea and history of Managers payouts
Chelsea has become accustomed to making significant payouts to sacked head coaches during Roman Abramovich’s tenure, with the highest payout of £26.6 million going to Antonio Conte and his staff in 2018. If FC Chelsea terminates Potter’s contract, his compensation would be almost double that figure.
Potter signed an unprecedented five-year deal with Chelsea, which is worth about £60 million, making him one of the highest-paid managers in the world. However, with the team’s poor form continuing, his future at the club seems uncertain.
The cost of sacking Potter would be a significant blow to Chelsea’s finances, especially with the current economic uncertainty caused by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The club’s hierarchy must weigh the potential cost of keeping Potter against the cost of letting him go, as they strive to get the team back to winning ways.
In conclusion, the future of Graham Potter as Chelsea’s manager is far from certain, and his continued poor form may lead to his dismissal. However, it is crucial for the club’s hierarchy to consider the significant cost of terminating his contract before making any decision, especially in these financially challenging times.